Talk:Uguisu no fun
A fact from Uguisu no fun appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 July 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Something not quite well about this article
[edit]Anyone else think there's something a bit off in this article? Cus I've got a suspicion that it isn't up to par when it comes to article standards.
Firstly - I'm not entirely sure that ugisu no fun is actually the same thing as a "Geisha facial" sold halfway across the world that, I'm guessing, just takes inspiration from someone's second read-through of Arthur Golden's Memoirs of a Geisha. It sounds like a trade name - not the same as its usage in Japan.
Secondly - and as an extension of the former - I'd really appreciate someone having a look over the sources and bibliography used here. It seems like on first glance, a lot of them might - and I've not read them, but they might - just be a number of different Western news outlets covering a facial offered by one New York City spa. Someone also shoved in MoaG for good measure, a fiction book, not a reliable reference; God knows Golden screwed up the rest of that novel.
I've gone through and added transl tags where I can, but I'd appreciate another pair of hands to have a look over this. Thanks! --Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 21:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- B-Class Japan-related articles
- Mid-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- B-Class fashion articles
- Low-importance fashion articles
- B-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles